Shiho Akita vs Naoko Eto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Oct at 12:59 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Akita vs N. Eto

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Akita 2 - 0 Eto
They have played 4 sets in total, with Shiho Akita winning 4 and Naoko Eto winning 0. The last match between Shiho Akita and Naoko Eto was at the W35 Darwin, 08-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Shiho Akita getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Akita | 2 |
| Eto | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Darwin(10-08-25)
(R2) W35 Timaru(02-13-25)
S. Akita vs N. Eto H2H Profile
S. Akita vs N. Eto Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In the last 6 months, Shiho Akita has a slightly better success rate on second serves, winning 37.18% of points compared to Naoko Eto's 32.35%.
- Return Game Comparison: While Shiho Akita wins 50.37% of points on the opponent's second serves, Naoko Eto is marginally ahead at 51.72%. However, Akita is notably more effective on first serve returns, winning 32.43% to Eto's 27.84%.
- Pressure Handling: Akita appears more resilient under pressure, saving 48.44% of breakpoints versus Eto's 36.46%, which can be crucial during tight matches.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Akita has a superior match win rate of 61.67% (37-23) compared to Eto's 32.00% (8-17).
- Surface Specialization: Both players show their best results on grass, with a win rate of 62%. However, Eto struggles significantly on clay with the worst win rate of 17%.
- Player Level Experience: Akita boasts a higher success rate of 60.78% in ITF tournaments over $10K, compared to Eto's 33.33% win rate in similar events.
- Head-to-Head Record: Akita has a clear advantage, having won their only previous encounter 6-0, 6-0, on a hard court.
- Deciding Set Performance: Should this match reach a deciding set, Akita has a strong track record, winning 69% of such sets, whereas Eto has a 50% win rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 8, 2025, UTC):
In this head-to-head comparison, Shiho Akita emerges as the stronger contender. Her marginally better performance in second serve points indicates a more reliable backup strategy when her first serve isn't effective.
When it comes to returning serves, Akita's superior ability to win points on both first and second serve returns could tilt the balance in her favor. This is crucial in maintaining momentum and breaking her opponent's serve.
Under pressure, Akita is clearly more adept at saving breakpoints, suggesting a more resilient in-game mentality, which is crucial in high-pressure situations.
Overall, Akita's better win percentage in the past year, along with her head-to-head dominance in their previous encounter, solidifies her as the likely favorite. This, coupled with a steady performance on her favored surfaces, plays to her advantage.
Taking all these factors into account, Shiho Akita is poised to win this upcoming match against Naoko Eto.
Shiho Akita vs Naoko Eto Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Akita vs N. Eto H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:10:22 | Average Match Time | 1:10:22 |
| 58% (49/84) | 1st Serve % | 76% (73/96) |
| 76% (37/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (30/73) |
| 60% (21/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (5/23) |
| 57% (12/21) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 64% (61/96) | Return Points Win % | 31% (26/84) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Akita Recent Matches Played
N. Eto Recent Matches Played

S. Akita vs N. Eto Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.61% (398/305) | YTD Win/Loss | 18.49% (49/216) |
| 55.92% (883/696) | Sets Win/Loss | 20.14% (112/444) |
| 52.75% (7565/6776) | Games Win/Loss | 33.48% (1533/3046) |
| 57.74% (276/202) | Hard Win/Loss | 19.23% (25/105) |
| 44.12% (15/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 17.02% (16/78) |
| 54.11% (79/67) | Indoor Hard W/L | 15.63% (5/27) |
| 62.22% (28/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 560 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1793 | Total Double Faults | 393 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 565.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 379.98 |
| 59% (13799/23561) | 1st Serve % | 71% (3956/5586) |
| 62% (8593/13799) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (1770/3956) |
| 43% (4217/9762) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (531/1630) |
| 48% (1563/3237) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (230/510) |
| 48% (11440/24007) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2158/5480) |
| 16.67% (2/10) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 53.91% (269/230) | Challenger W/L | 16.00% (16/84) |
| 66.15% (127/65) | Futures W/L | 20.63% (33/127) |
| 58% (392/680) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 18% (48/261) |
| 17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (56/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (8/22) |
| 53% (98/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 88% (386/341) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (45/39) |
| 11% (386/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (45/6) |
| 18% (315/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (220/10) |